Doug’s Dilemma
Doug dimly dreamed of a delicious delicacy derived from Danish dairy desserts. At dawn, debt-diminished dollars denied Doug’s delight. In despair, Doug deduced that diabolic deeds be drafted. Doug deliberated, deciding to dodge drink and develop dangerous designs.
Doug decided on a dashing deceit, whereby demonstrating a drunken, deplorable, and decrepit demeanor, he dawdled into a drugstore, then demanded the druggist dispense dollars or a device Doug designed would detonate dynamite.
The Druggist didn’t dawdle and determined Doug was a dimwitted doofus, and his dubious, dodgy deception was deplorable. He decided to deter Doug’s demand by deliberately displaying a derringer and dagger directly toward Doug and daring him to do it.
Doug was dumbfounded and disgusted. Detecting determination in the druggist’s demeanor, Doug decided to demonstrate dour discipline and deliberately depart in disgrace.
Doug’s departure into disrepute dictated doing deeds differently.
Dutifully drawing a diagram of dynamic discoveries that determined definitive yet dubious diamonds, Doug decreed on X (formerly Twitter) delivery dependent on dollars deposited. Doug dispatched the document diligently without delay.
Unfortunately, a Deputy detective detected Doug’s deceit and determined Doug deserved detention, dealing Doug a disastrous defeat, and Doug’s destiny was dutifully defunct.
Moral: Don’t dabble in dishonesty to devour a doughnut.
